Identification of the article and of the reviewer
General criteria (10 points)
Relevance and interest of the subject according to the aims of the journal* :
Quality of the language and structure of the text* :
Scientific criteria (40 points)
Problems and theoretical contribution* :
The problems are clearly presented; it is scientifically and socially relevant, it is based on a whole of clearly documented facts. In the theoretical plan, the review of documentation is relevant with the object of study and takes account of the recent writings. The questions or assumptions of research are clear and rise from the problems.
Methodology is fastened with the questions or assumptions of research. It is clearly justified (choice of the sample, choice of the tools of gathering, choice of the tools and the methods for data processing).
The results are presented briefly with a level of detail which allows the readers to evaluate the relevance of the discussion.
The discussion highlights the contribution of research at the comprehension of the problems. It presents the limits of research and opportunities for future research.
Join the manuscript with the comments (optional):
(Maximum file size : 8 Mb)
Other comments to the authors
Comments to the authors
Comments to editor (optional)
Your comments to be sent only to the members of the editor. The comments will not be communicated to the authors
The manuscript should be accepted for publication.
The manuscript should be accepted if the person applies the requested modifications.
The manuscript should be altered in-depth and submitted again.
The manuscript should be refused.
* Indicate an obligatory field